Fun
Home is a complicated, multilayered narrative complete with flashbacks,
imaginings, close-ups on highlighted texts, and constant mythical parallels
(Icarus, dedaulus, Adam’s family, Mephistopholes). The wide framing of the
graphic memoir imbues it with an allegoric quality itself, that Allison’s story
reaches far beyond her own life and into the lives of her grandmother,
grandfather, father, as well as the great mythics themselves. Through this wide
framing, the reader is able to track certain intergenerational traumas that
occur between the generations of characters, each panel fitting in to a larger
family structure. A moment that exemplifies this is when the father calls
Allison into the embalming room. Until this point, the father has been
characterized as cold, stoic, and not offering affection towards the children,
and at times abusive. There isn’t much explanation about his inability to
access emotions, but he calls Allison in to the embalming room to a grotesque
panel of a dead naked man with a gaping chest cavity to ask her to pass him the
scissors. Allison reflects on her father’s utter lack of emotion when dealing
with the dead, and internalizes it. When her father dies, she finds herself
incapable of accessing the ‘normal’ amount of grief, only crying for two
minutes, greeting her brother with a grin. Her most dramatic moves are violent physical
gestures, throwing off the funeral director’s comforting hand / throwing the
flag on the grave into the cornfield. These violent gestures are mimetic to her
father’s physical hand towards her. Even while he’s alive, she feels as though
he’s already gone, and when he’s gone his violent emotional and physical
tendencies resonate in Allison’s and her brother’s characters.
Bechdel recognizes of flaws as a
storyteller based on how society frames gender in favor of fathers “Although I’m
good at enumerating my father’s flaws, it’s hard for me to sustain much anger
at him. / I expect this is partly because he’s dead, and partly because the bar
is lower for fathers than for mothers” (22). Across these short narrated lines,
so much is conveyed. Instead of a hovering omniscient voice, the narrator self
reflects as to why she says certain things and why she has certain beliefs.
This brings the narrator down to the reader’s level in helping to understand
her thought process: she has feelings that conflict with her father’s actions
growing up, but due to internalizing society’s general acceptance of abusive
fathers, her anger towards him does not last. Furthermore, Bechdel’s
recognition of her conflicting feelings towards her father is also an acceptance
of her subjectivity as a narrator, and a cue to the reader to not necessarily
trust her, or to also consider the social / political context from which she’s
writing (growing up in the 60’s in Pennsylvania and then writing Fun Home in the 2000’s). These lines
complicate the narrative as a self-reflective, adult looking back graphic
memoir. Also, Bechdel’s recognition of her complicated and conflicting
sympathies for her father based on his suicide and gendered societal narratives
make the reader feel part of her thought process for returning to her
childhood, reflecting on it, and crafting on it.
Andrea
I also feel like this book really made Bechel's processing of her memories apparent. The layers of visual/textual elements in the graphic novel are an effective medium for portraying complicated and conflicting feelings. The reader is able to make connections through visual clues and scenes. The connetion that you brought up between her fathers cold emotionless attitude towards mourning and Bechel's own disconnected grieving process was made stronger through the visual images (a cut open corpse/her fathers body in the same position).
ReplyDeleteGreat point about Bechdel embracing and admitting to her conflicting feelings, Andrea. I think you're right that it contributes greatly to the the access the reader gains into her thought process and the intimacy that seems to build between the narrator and the reader. For me a great example of this is when she showed us her strange reactions to the news of her father's death. She shows us the way she laughed with her brother when she came home for the funeral and reflects on it. She examines what may have caused her too laugh at such an inappropriate moment and speculates that it had something to do with her father's role at the funeral home and as a fixture of the house. She admits that him not being there anymore felt ridiculous, even funny. I liked that she was willing to show that.
ReplyDeletethe vulnerability is all over and i think you nailed it by pointing out how there is no hovering narrator, but the reflective self. That means it all comes from the psyche of the character. Which has little reliability. So that's a good question. Do we trust her?
ReplyDeleteReading your post and thinking how the time distance in time from the events happening to the writing of them made me think about that large section when most of the events were referred to in her diary. First off, whey didn't I keep one? It would make my whole thesis process easier. lol but more importantly it def brings up weather or not she is too be trusted esp. when she admits that some things were omitted. What really is memory even when we have a record or events?
ReplyDelete